Aðalsíðan
English Page


. Addresses

.Archive

. Cathedral

. Caring

. Statistics

. Court

. Images

. Links

 
Archives



Lenten Pastoral Letter 2008
by Bishop Peter Bürcher


Dear brothers and sisters,

Today I have the joy of sending my first Pastoral letter to all Catholics in Iceland. From all my heart I thank the priests who will read it to you on this Sunday before Lent 2008.

I have been asked many times what my first impressions of Iceland were. My answer has been; everything is new to me: the language, the particular and ever changing climate, the beauties of nature, the long nights during this period of the year and especially the warm hearted people of various backgrounds, the Catholic community which is very much alive and ever growing: Were there not 156 baptisms in 2007 and only 16 deaths. I am very happy to be your bishop who has come to serve you. I hope that one day, like Bishop Johannes Gijsen whom I would like to thank again, I will be able to say that the years passed in Iceland were the most beautiful in my life. I do want to thank you all for your faithful prayer for your Bishop.

Today the Gospel offers us one of its most beautiful passages, that is to say the Beatitudes: “Rejoice and be glad… for your reward is great in heaven!”. What are the reasons why we can be happy today?

In every moment, in spite of our shortcomings, we try to do the will of God. It is God who made us. He created us in Jesus Christ so that our acting may be truly good and in conformity with the path that God has traced out for us and that we have to follow. Trying to improve continually in order not to step back. This was the resolution that Pope John XXIII formed for his life: to accomplish well what he had to do in the present moment as if he were born only for that moment.

Dear brothers and sisters it might be that you progress in your life with the greatest of ease, as do other people around you. Might be that you earn a lot of money. We all need money but it doesn’t necessarily provide true inner peace and happiness. Still, each of you is looking for true happiness. Try to find it! But don’t search too far away! Don’t travel to the ends of the world to find it! For, if you are seeking happiness far away from you, you won’t ever find it.

So, where is true happiness to be found? Where is it? Happiness, of course, will be complete only in Paradise. But for the present moment, Jesus himself points to it in today’s Gospel: “Happy the peacemakers… happy those who hunger and thirst for what is right…”. These are the words of the same Jesus who said in Nazareth: “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me”. And this Spirit of God is truly strength, light, joy and peace. So don’t search for it elsewhere: it is in you, in your heart.

Nonetheless, even if we normally let God guide us with his Spirit of Love, the Tempter can prowl around in wait for us to lead us astray. Let’s therefore be vigilant and ready – if necessary – to convert our hearts!

On our own we are not able to reach true happiness; we need the Holy Spirit and also the help of other people. Let’s open our eyes and hearts for the many people around us who let God’s Spirit guide them. They serve others and radiate peace and the joy of their faith in God. They discovered God to be the treasure of their lives as it is He who makes them really happy. Speaking about Saint Paul, Saint John Chrysostom said: “He was rich with the love of Christ which was the greatest of all things to him. While he had this, he reckoned himself the most blessed of men.” This is also the path that is proposed by Lent, which is starting this week. So let us come in great numbers to church to set out together on this path this Ash Wednesday.

Last year, our Pope Benedict XVI invited us to walk this path: “May Lent be for every Christian a renewed experience of God’s love given to us in Christ, a love that each day we, in turn, must “re-give” to our neighbour, especially to the one who suffers most and is in need. Only in this way will we be able to participate fully in the joy of Easter. May Mary, Mother of Beautiful Love, guide us in this Lenten journey, a journey of authentic conversion to the love of Christ.” This year the Pope invites us to mark this Lenten time of grace with the giving of alms.

I wish you, dear brothers and sisters, that the Holy Spirit may dwell more deeply in you. May you discover Him in yourselves, may you discover him in others! I am convinced that we will be able to do so more and more, with an always greater heart, ready to love. “You must love the Lord your God with all your heart… and your neighbour as yourself!” Now, this is our Christian identity card, or if you prefer, our kennitala of true happiness. “Rejoice and be glad … for your reward is great in heaven!”

Your Bishop Peter.


Reykjavík, 27 January 2008


 Mt 5:12
 Mt 5: 6
 Lk 4:18
 Hom 2 on St Paul
 Pope Benedict XVI, Messege for Lent 2007, Vatican 21 November 2006
 Cf. Pope Benedixt XVI, Message for Lent 2008, Vatican, 30 October 2007
 Mk 12:30-31 (cf. Dt 6:4-5; Lv 19:18)
 Mt 5:12




Jan. 2007

LENTEN MESSAGE 2007

Bishop Johannes Gijsen


This will be the last Lent-message I will bring you as your bishop. In October of this year I will – if the Lord allows – become 75 years old. This is the age at which a bishop of the Catholic Church has to resign. That means: Although he remains bishop, he has to give up the administration of his diocese, and to ask the Holy Father to appoint a younger one. I have already written my letter of resignation and may expect that at the end of the year the new bishop will take place at the see of Reykjavík.

For me this is a good cause, I think, to point out at the beginning of Lent, the period in which the Church invites us to reflect our way of thinking and doing as Christians, some head-lines of our faith and its consequences for our life. The Gospel of today – the story of the temptation of Jesus in the wilderness – tells us very clearly which those have to be.
The main point is the respect for God and his leadership. Not we as human beings have to destine the course of things in our life and in the world, but God, our Creator. Jesus says: “You must worship the Lord your God and serve Him alone.” In our time this is not self-evident. Many people –although if they recognize the existence of God as the deepest cause of the world – think that they themselves may mould their life into concrete form and organize the world according to their own ideas and desires. The commandments of God seem to them at the utmost to be guidelines you may follow or not. But we have to take seriously what God has said to us, particularly by the revelation of Jesus, his Son. This we know by the proclamation of the Church. Besides we have to honour God, like Jesus has done, by our adoration and our prayers. All this we have not to conceive as a burden, but as an opportunity to be sure that our life will get a stable fundament as well as a clear perspective, because God wishes to carry us like a father carries his children, to preserve us from false decisions and to show us the right view on the possibilities we experience around us to build up the world in favour of all people, and – along this road – to assure us of his love.

Three points the Gospel underlines regarding our way of realizing our honouring of God:
We have not to look only or mainly for material wealth. Not much money, plenty of food and luxury will guarantee a happy life. “Man does not live on bread alone,” Jesus says. Although we need food and clothes and we have to work for it, it will be more important to use the material things to build up a life of love and goodness, not only for ourselves, but for all people we meet, particularly for our family.
Also power will not give the real happiness. Jesus – the powerful Son of God – has shown us that we have  to serve others. Only this guarantees good relationships between human beings. Perhaps this may cost self-conquest, but the reward for it will be a pure and peaceful heart and the arrival in heaven.
If we only look for a material wealth for ourselves and to get a hold on others we are serving the Devil. Jesus however says: only God has the right to be adored.

Therefore we have, particularly during Lent, to reflect our desires, our way of life and our behaviour. We have to renew and to deepen our relationship with God. Has He the main place in our considerations? Are his commandments for us the real rules of our life? Do we honour God by regular praying and by participation in the Holy Mass and other sacraments of the Church? Do we work for the good of our family, but will we also give our time and interest to all its members? Are we prepared to serve others, particularly the poor, the lonely and the and the sick and older people? And let we God be the only Ruler of our life?
If we try to affirm all these questions, we may be sure that we are really Christians. This would be for me the most beautiful result of my working among you as your bishop.
Hoping that this may be so, I thank you for it heartily and wish you a joyful rise into Easter.


Jóhannes Gijsen
bishop of Reykjavík
Reykjavík, the 1st of February 2007




Jan. 2007

World Day of the Sick
February 11, 2007


On February 11 1858 the Holy Virgin Mary appeared to Bernadette Soubirous, a girl of 14, in a cave near Lourdes in Southern-France. Since then this place, which before was a little known village, has been the most visited place for pilgrimage of Christian people in the world. The most important reason is the fact that very many sick and suffering people have found some remedy for their suffering, and some have even been totally cured. As important are the spiritual “miracles” that have happened to the people – unhappy people go home happy, belief has replaced their doubts. The sick as well as the healthy find solace there and increased strength through the intercession of the Holy Virgin Mary.
No one else but Pope John Paul II, who himself had to suffer sickness and pain in his last years, chose February 11, the day of remembrance of the first apparition of Our Lady in Lourdes, as the “World Day of the Sick”. With that he declared his solidarity with all of those that have to suffer and on the other side he encourages us to show compassion and care for those of us who are sick, as well as our suffering brothers and sisters. At the same time he reminded us of a matter that is at the centre of the Christian message.
If we ask ourselves what characterizes our ideas about Jesus Christ, we would first think of the crucified, the risen and the baby in the manger, but also of his compassion for the sick. That is how his contemporaries saw him, he was the one who cared for the sick, as he said himself: “It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick” (Mt 9:12).
He also also told the disciples, when he sent them on their missioin, to care for the sick. The Church has taken up this work as an important part of her duty. She knows with certainty that she can activate the healing power of her Lord if she calls upon his name.

This care for the sick and dying people was always a heartfelt part of the Church’s mission. She was left in no doubt that the Lord would support her in this care with his graces. From the beginning she has prayed specially for the sick. And she believes and proclaims that among the seven sacraments there is one that is established precisely to strengthen those that suffer from some sickness or other by giving them the anointment of holy chrism, accompanied with prayer and the imposition of hands.
But this care for the sick is by no means only the matter of the priests. Through the centuries a tradition was developed within the Church where we talk about the Seven Spiritual Works of Mercy and the Seven Corporal Works of Mercy as the duty of every Christian and a way to redemption.
Among the Seven Corporal Works is the fifth: to visit the sick. Among the others there are: to feed the hungry, to give drink to the thirsty, to clothe the naked, to harbour the harbourless and to visit the imprisoned. It is also no coincidence that this is a direct citation from the gospel of Matthew, where Jesus is telling in a parable about his return at the end of time when everyone is gathered to receive his judgement. Those who performed the so called Corporal Works will be received into heaven, although they didn’t realize that they met Jesus exactly in those poor individuals: “I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me” (Mt 25:40).
There Jesus says to us all: whenever you have discovered sorrow and mourning in the face of the suffering and didn’t cover your faces, you have seen me.
When the blessed have found the suffering Christ in their poor brothers, what then should the least of those brothers see? The should not have to look at faces full of hate and contempt, but at the faces of people where they can also recognize the face of Christ.
The blessed recognize the suffering Christ in the least of their brothers and the suffering find the mercyful Christ when they look at those that help them. That is one and the same Christ.
In the course of the centuries many have tried to follow this teaching of Christ and to give us a clear precedent. We only have to remember the best known saints of charity who particularly took care of the sick: Such as Francis of Assisi, Elizabeth of Hungary or Mother Teresa. They dedicated their life and work to the care for the sick, among the rich and the poor.
One of them is the Empress Placilla, who lived in the fourth century. In her biography we read: “The strength of her dignity led Empress Placilla, the wife of Theodocius the Great, not towards arrogance, but kindled in her ever stronger the longing for God. She did charitable work in order to thank God, her Creator. For example she tended those that were crippled in some way. She didn’t send her servants or guards, but went by herself and gave to each what he needed most. In the same way she went from one guesthouse to the other and tended the sick herself. She herself took the pots and pans, tasted the soup, broke the bread, gave them a bite, washed out the beaker and did all of those things normally reserved for the servants and maids. And if someone tried to prevent this, she answered: “To distribute money belongs to the imperial dignity, but I offer up for the imperial dignity itself personal service to the Giver.””
Placilla didn’t order anyone to serve the sick and ailing in her name, nor did she finance such a service and put it into the hands of others, but rather she left her palace and the comfort, searched for the sick both at their homes and in the hostels and then did what she could to show them care.
Therefore, the main thing is to visit the sick, but not to leave them alone, and to inform oneself about where they are and how they are. This is especially the task of us, the  priests, who are willing to visit patients, both in hospitals and homes for the aged people, or at home. But regretfully we often simply lack the necessary information. Therefore the parishioners are kindly asked to let the priests know if someone in the family or one of their friends or colleagues is in hospital and expects the visit of a priest. Those visits are not only important for the sick and the weak, but also for the priest. Here he is doing his work as a true disciple of his Master who cared so much for the sick and needy. Perhaps each priest first and foremost recognizes his vocation under three circumstances: In the liturgy, especially at Holy Mass, in the confessional and visiting the sick. Don’t hesitate to make contact with the priest. By doing that you are helping him to fulfil his duties as a priest.
But care for the sick and elderly is not only the work of the priests. Like many examples display – and I mentioned some of them before – it is the concern of all Christians. In many parishes, for example, there is a group of people organizing and going on visits to hospitals or old peoples’ homes. We should think about the possibility of organizing this also here among the Catholics in Iceland.

“I was sick and you looked after me.”
Those are the words of Christ himself. We will not find him in deep thoughts or emotional prayer if we do not find him in the face of those that need us. Christian faith is far from being just a matter of the heart, a private matter or a child’s belief.
It is very real.
The one who looks after the sick will discover that.

Sermon of Fr. Jürgen Jamin
in Christ’s Church in Landakot, Sunday, February 11
on the occasion of World Day of the Sick





1.3.2006

On Conduct in the Mass
and in the Liturgy


On the 23d of October 2005 the “Year of the Eucharist” was completed with a festive act in Rome. The purpose of this year, from October 2004 till October 2005 was to encourage Catholics all over the world to deepen their understanding of the mystery of the presence of Jesus Christ in the most holy Eucharist, primarily by taking part in Holy Mass and prayer meetings outside of Mass.

When we consider the innermost core of this mystery of faith – that Christ gives himself, his body and blood in the forms of consecrated bread and wine – then we should realize that also we have to give ourselves, body and soul, when we receive this sacrament. Therefore the communion is not only something spiritual that happens inside us, but it also concerns our bodies and our physical conduct in church. A few years ago the well-known radio-host, Jónas Jónasson, gave an advent-lecture for the Catholic Lay-Society in the parish-hall in Landakot. In it he recalled the memories from his youth when he visited the Landakot-School and his acquaintance with the Montfort-priests and the St. Joseph’s sisters. From time to time he went to Mass in our cathedral and was fascinated by the service of the altar-boys. He would very much have liked to be one of them, dressed in a beautiful gown and rochet, in order to “serve the Invisible in a visible way,” like he himself put it. We can hardly describe the liturgy and our conduct in a better way than with these words of Jónas: “to serve the Invisible in a visible way”. And that is precisely what we do with our bodies.

For example, when the president of Iceland takes part in a concert he enters the hall as the last of all guests. Everybody stands up to show him, or rather his office, respect, and they do not sit down until he has been seated. If we show a person such respect, how much more respect do we then owe to God and all that relates to Him! And here we can correct many things.

It starts with entering a building called “a church”, to be in a holy place.  At the consecration of a church-building a special place is proclaimed inviolate and it shall belong to God alone – disconnected from any other purpose and use, so that man becomes aware of that which is more than nature or the act of man: the holy. But how can a place be holy? Not by its own strength. Nothing created can by itself become home to the holiness of God. A place becomes holy when God Himself makes it holy. It happens when God approaches the place, becomes present, makes it to his dwelling place. But God is everywhere in heaven and on earth. Yes, it is true, no place is without God. But our faith tells us from the presence of God and his dwelling place in a special spot, i.e. man becomes aware of God’s presence: “God is here”. It starts in the Old Testament, for example in the story about the dream of Jacob. He saw a stairway rest on the ground, with its top reaching to the heavens; and God’s messengers were going up and down on it. “When Jacob awoke from his sleep, he exclaimed, ‘Truly, the Lord is in this spot, although I did not know it!’ In solemn wonder he cried out: ‘How awesome is this shrine! This is nothing else but an abode of God, and that is the gateway to heaven!’” (Gen 1, 28, 10). And in Exodus is written that God appeared to Moses in a flame out of a bush. When Moses came closer to investigate this, God called him from the bush: ”Come no nearer! Remove the sandals from your feet, for the place where you stand is holy ground” (Ex 3, 1).


As soon as we enter a church we dip our fingertips into a bowl of water and make the sign of the cross with consecrated water. These are the last remnants of the foot-washing by the early Christians before entering church. But for us this is in remembrance of our baptism.
We are still in the front hall of the church where people usually gather for a short conversation after Mass. But this space is no less a part of the church than the main building of the church or the choir around the altar. Therefore we are encouraged to show the delicacy of not disturbing the worship of others by talking in the front room of the church. There are always some visitors who want to pray silently after Mass inside the church or listen to the postlude of the organ. It is intolerable that people speak loudly in the front hall of the church while other people are still praying! Therefore refreshments are offered in the parish-hall after Mass on Sunday so that people can have the opportunity to meet and chat – but please do not do so any more inside the church!

Before we take our seat on the bench we kneel to show our adoration of Jesus Christ who is present in the tabernacle. If we for health reasons can no longer kneel down, it is recommended that we bow our heads as a sign of respect. It is also recommended that we do not sit down immediately but kneel for a while in order to show adoration and reverence to God.

A worthy acceptance of the Eucharist not only demands that the recipient is spiritually prepared within himself. The outer conduct of the recipient is also subject to some conditions. It should be reverential. This reverence should also appear in the conduct of the individual. It is not fitting when going to the table of the Lord to have chewing gum in the mouth or have both hands in the pocket (as some men can be observed to do) or keep gloves on the hands. Other people want to receive the host between their fingertips instead of putting it directly on the palm or on the tongue. Still others want to take the host with them and consume it on their way to the seat, often chewing, which is highly inappropriate.

When receiving the Eucharist we should clasp our hands. We receive the Eucharist at the communion-rail as soon as it is put in our palm or on our tongue. Then we return to our seat with clasped hands. It is recommended that we for a moment reverently and thankfully kneel after having received this great gift of God.  In order to be able to concentrate still better, it is good for us to close our eyes or hide our face in our hands.

In his book “The Horizon of Devotion”, the German theologian Karl Rahner says: “In innumerable instances we can find the inner and the our side of man. Both are different  from the other and yet they belong together. The inner is only then totally and absolutely completed when it appears and materializes in the outer. The outer can under certain circumstances be deceptive (like the kiss of Judas), without the inner, which shall in this way become reality and communicate itself, being really present there. But the outer can also, when man does it freely in accordance with its meaning, make the inner happen. Many have for example discovered in their mind what prayer really means when they knelt down on their knees…”
Our conduct and behaviour in the liturgy is important because we are human beings, created with a body and a soul!


Rev. Jürgen Jamin

(A sermon held in Christ’s Church
on the Feast of the Presentation of the Lord,
January 8, 2006)





Statement from the Nordic Bishops´ Conference

The Nordic Bishops´ Conference
deplores the publication of cartoon drawings
of the Prophet Mohammed


The Danish newspaper Jyllands-Postens publication of cartoon drawings of the Prophet Mohammed has been given widespread attention among Muslims and many others, all over the world.  Many have experienced that their religion has been attacked and devalued.

The Roman Catholic Bishops´ Conference of the Nordic countries deplores this attack on religion and the undoubted hurt which it has caused among our Muslim friends.  For the vast majority of people, religion gives meaning to their lives, and its tenets are the source of the traditions and rules by which they live.  Again and again, in our Nordic area, it seems that certain opinion makers feel that they are wholly free to say what they wish without any respect for the understanding and beliefs of other people.  We welcome free and open discussion which searches for the truth but in a context and climate of mutual respect and knowledge about what one is speaking of.

Our sympathies go out to our Muslim sisters and brothers, and we assure them of our prayers to the one God that we believe in that he will support us and come to our protection.



 

GOD IS LOVE: FIRST ENCYCLICAL OF BENEDICT XVI

Given below is a summary of Benedict XVI's first Encyclical, entitled "Deus caritas est" (God is love). Dated December 25, Solemnity of the Nativity of the Lord, it considers the question of Christian love.

The Encyclical is divided into two long parts. The first, entitled, "The Unity of Love in Creation and in Salvation History," presents a theological-philosophical reflection on "love" in its various dimensions - "eros," "philia," and "agape" - highlighting certain vital aspects of God's love for man and the inherent links that such love has with human love. The second part, entitled "The Practice of Love by the Church as a 'Community of Love'," concerns the concrete implementation of the commandment to love others.

PART ONE

The term "love" - one of the most used, and abused, words in today's world - has a vast field of meaning. In this multiplicity of meanings, however, the archetype of love par excellence that emerges is that between man and woman, which in ancient Greece was given the name of "eros." In the Bible, and above all in the New Testament, the concept of "love" is rendered more profound, a development expressed by the rejection of the word "eros" in favor of the term "agape" to express oblate love.

This new view of love, an essential novelty of Christianity, has not infrequently been considered in a completely negative sense as the refusal of "eros" and of all things corporeal. Although there have been tendencies of this nature, the meaning of this development is quite different. "Eros," placed in the nature of man by his Creator, needs discipline, purification and maturity in order not to lose its original dignity, and not be degraded to the level of being pure "sex," becoming a mere commodity.

The Christian faith has always considered man as a being in whom spirit and matter are mutually intertwined, drawing from this a new nobility. The challenge of "eros" may be said to have been overcome when man's body and soul are in perfect harmony. Then love truly becomes "ecstasy," but not ecstasy in the sense of a passing moment of euphoria, but as a permanent departure from the "I" closed within itself towards freedom in the giving of self and, precisely in this way, towards the rediscovery of self, or rather, towards the discovery of God. In this way, "eros" can raise the human being "in ecstasy" towards the Divine.

Ultimately what is necessary is that "eros" and "agape" never be completely separated from one another; indeed, the greater the extent to which the two - though in different dimensions - find their right equilibrium, the more the true nature of love is realized. Although initially "eros" is, above all, desire, in approaching the other person it will ask ever fewer questions about itself and seek ever more happiness in the other, it will give itself and desire to "be there" for the other. Thus the one becomes part of the other and the moment of "agape" is achieved.

In Jesus Christ, Who is the incarnate love of God, "eros-agape" achieves its most radical form. In His death on the cross, Jesus, giving Himself to raise and save mankind, expressed love in its most sublime form. Jesus ensured a lasting presence for this act of giving through the institution of the Eucharist, in which, under the species of bread and wine, He gives Himself as a new manna uniting us to Him. By participating in the Eucharist, we too become involved in the dynamics of His act of giving. We unite ourselves to Him, and at the same time unite ourselves with everyone else to whom He gives Himself. Thus we all become "a single body." In this way, love for God and love for others are truly fused together. The dual commandment, thanks to this encounter with the "agape" of God, is no longer just a requirement: love can be "commanded," because first it was given.

PART TWO

Love for others rooted in the love of God, in addition to being the duty of each individual faithful, is also the duty of the entire ecclesial community, which in its charitable activities must reflect Trinitarian love. An awareness of this duty has been of fundamental importance in the Church ever since her beginnings; and very soon the need became clear for a certain degree of organization as a basis for a more effective realization of those activities.

Thus, within the fundamental structure of the Church, the "deaconry" emerged as a service of love towards others, a love exercised collectively and in an ordered fashion: a concrete service, but at the same time a spiritual one. With the progressive growth of the Church, the practice of charity was confirmed as being one of her essential aspects. The Church's intimate nature is thus expressed in a triple duty: announcing the Word of God ("kerygma-martyria"), celebrating the Sacraments ("leiturgia"), and the service of charity ("diakonia"). These duties are inherent to one another and cannot be separated.

Beginning in the nineteenth century, a fundamental objection was raised against the Church's charitable activity. Such activity, it was said, runs counter to justice and ends up by preserving the status quo. By carrying out individual acts of charity, the reasoning went, the Church favors the preservation of the existing unjust system, making it in some way bearable and thus hindering rebellion and potential transformation to a better world.

In this way, Marxism sought to indicate in world revolution, and in the preparations for such revolution, a panacea for social ills; a dream that has since been shattered. Pontifical Magisterium - beginning with Leo XIII's Encyclical "Rerum novarum" (1891), and later with John Paul II's three social Encyclicals: "Laborem exercens" (1981), "Sollicitudo rei socialis" (1987), and "Centesimus annus" (1991) - has considered the social question with growing attention and, in facing ever new problems, has developed a highly complex social doctrine, proposing guidelines that are valid well beyond the confines of the Church.

The creation of a just order in society and the State is the primary duty of politics, and therefore cannot be the immediate task of the Church. Catholic social doctrine does not want to give the Church power over the State, but simply to purify and illuminate reason, offering its own contribution to the formation of consciences so that the true requirements of justice may be perceived, recognized and put into effect. Nonetheless, there is no State legislation, however just it may be, that can make the service of love superfluous. The State that wishes to provide for everything becomes a bureaucratic machine, incapable of ensuring that essential contribution of which suffering man - all mankind - has need: loving personal dedication. Whoever wants to dispose of love, seeks to dispose of man.

In our own time, one positive collateral effect of globalization appears in the fact that concern for others, overcoming the confines of national communities, tends to broaden the horizons of the whole world. Structures of State and humanitarian associations both support, in various ways, the solidarity expressed by civil society; thus, many charitable and philanthropic organizations have come into being. In the Catholic Church too, as in other ecclesial communities, new forms of charitable activity have arisen. It is to be hoped that fruitful collaboration may be established between these various elements. Of course, it is important that the Church's charitable work does not lose its own identity, lost against the background of widespread organized charity of which it is simply another alternative. Rather it must maintain all the splendor of the essence of Christian and ecclesial charity. Therefore:

Christian charitable activity, apart from its professional competence, must be based on the experience of a personal encounter with Christ, Whose love touched believers' hearts, generating within them love for others.

Christian charitable activity must be independent of parties and ideologies. The program of Christians - the program of the Good Samaritan, the program of Jesus - is a "heart that sees." This heart sees where there is need of love and acts accordingly.

Christian charitable activity, furthermore, must not be a function of that which today is called proselytism. Love is gratuitous, it is not exercised in order to achieve other goals. However, this does not mean that charitable activity must, so to say, leave God and Christ on one side. Christians know when the time is right to speak of God, and when it is right to be silent and let love alone speak. St. Paul's hymn of charity must be the "Magna Charta" for the entire ecclesial service, protecting it from the risk of degrading into mere activism.

In this context, and faced with the impending secularism that also risks conditioning many Christians committed to charitable work, we must reaffirm the importance of prayer. Living contact with Christ ensures that the immensity of need coupled with the limits of individual activity do not, on the one hand, push charity workers into ideologies that seek to do now that which God, apparently, does not manage to do or, on the other, serve as a temptation to surrender to inertia and resignation. Those who pray do not waste their time, although a situation may seem to call only for action, nor do they seek to change and correct God's plan. Rather they aim - following the example of Mary and the saints - to draw from God the light and the strength of love that defeats all the darkness and selfishness present in the world.



 

 





Statement of the Nordic Bishops on Migration


Migration is a typical phenomenon of our globalized world of today. We can look on it as a sign of God’s providential love that can strengthen the bonds of universal solidarity between peoples. Thanks to the immigration our local churches in the Nordic countries have been able to develop and bring the Gospel to many in our secularized society. We are most grateful to the Catholics who have come from all over the world to help us build up our Church.
According to the Church’s social doctrine, the countries receiving immigrants and refugees should treat them with justice and love. Lately, though, we Bishops have noticed some alarming signs in the Nordic countries: a lack of generosity to receive refugees and asylum seekers, a growing xenophobia, segregation etc. We call, therefore, on all people of good will to work for an open and welcoming society where every single human being is treated in a just and truly human way.
As Catholic Bishops in the North of Europe we commit ourselves to do all we can to offer our immigrants the pastoral care they need, in their native language, when needed. We also call upon them to help us to build a Catholic community together with believers of all origins. We, the Catholic Bishops of the Nordic countries maintain our decision not to have any national parishes, but through our pastors to offer care in various languages. It is our deep desire to promote cooperation between our local parishes and various national groups in order to be what we really are: one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church, where believers of all nationalities and races are united as a prophetical sign of the heavenly Jerusalem.





Report of the Scandinavian Bishops to the Synod of 2005


October 2 -23 the XI General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops was held in Rome on “The Eucharist: Source and Summit of the Life and Mission of the Church”. Bishop Czeslaw Kozon of Copenhagen handed in the following report on behalf of the Scandinavian bishops:
    The countries that belong to the Scandinavian Bishops’ Conference stretch over large and sparely populated areas where about 200,000 Catholics live, with a varying population, more dense however in Sweden, Norway and Denmark. The countries are predominantly Lutheran and they are rather secular, to a different degree though.
    Among the largest problems of the parishes are the large distances between places. Despite that it is possible to read Holy Mass in most of the parishes on Sundays with about 20–30% of the faithful attending. Although the number of priests is relatively high, the number of priests can not be reduced because of the great distances.
    Under those unusual circumstances the experience of the priests and the faithful in Scandinavia is the same as in many other countries in Northern and Western Europe.
    The Sunday Mass is the main feature of the liturgy and it is largely the only liturgical ceremony that people attend in the church. In many places however, quite a number of people attend Mass during the week and interest in the adoration of the Holy Eucharist is steadily growing.
    Interest in the liturgy is relatively high among the faithful and they appreciate well-organized and well-prepared ceremonies. The participation of the faithful in the preparation and performance of the liturgy is very high in many places. In spite of that we need more opportunities for further studies and courses in order to strengthen  the knowledge of the people about liturgy and their understanding of them. Certainly most people have a good understanding of the Eucharist but there is still need for emphasizing better still the characteristics of the mystery and the offer in Holy Mass. Further Catholic people in the Nordic countries need to unite their faith with life so that participation in the reception of the Eucharist leads to an increased participation in the life of the Church and of the community. Further participation in penance is still far from being enough. Serious misconduct regarding liturgy is almost non-existent.
    The faithful expect that their voice be heard in many domains and that they are taken seriously and they at the same time have deep respect for the priests. The work of the lay-faithful, also as leaders during Mass, does not lead to the disturbance of the boundary between the lay-faithful and the priests.
    Regarding ecumenical matters the Catholic Church observes that although the relationship of the churches is generally positive, people are increasingly less understanding about common communion. The Catholic view on this problem is according to the opinion of other Christians outdated, and regretfully some Catholics share this view.
    We should also mention the painful circumstances of many divorced and remarried Catholics, who can not participate in the reception of the Eucharist.
    In spite of these problems and issues the communion is held as a religious feast in the Nordic countries, which gathers the community together and in that way lends a powerful assistance in building up the Church.



5.10.2005

Anna Björg Harðadóttir reports on her experiences during
World Youth Day 2005

 
   I am very blessed by God for he has given me so many things and opportunities in life.  I am thankful to him for he wanted me to go to my first World Youth Day in Cologne, Germany.
   I had so many new experiences on the trip.  We went to many beautiful and holy places, not only in Germany but in Holland and Belgium too.  Sometimes it was a little difficult and we also got very tired--we had to walk everyday, and on our first day there, we had to walk for almost 3 hours!  But still I enjoyed it.  I am glad that I got to see the Holy Father, even though he was a little far away and we didn´t see him properly because of so many participants.  I am still thankful and happy but most especially for attending the Holy Father’s Mass.
   And I thank God for being able to have a lot of fun, for my new friends that I met, for the masses and the catechism we went to every day, and for those who took care of us, especially Father Gabriel, Sister Cielos and Sister Assumption.
   And now I hope and pray that I can go to the next World Youth Day in Australia in 2008.




The bishop writes:

Our aims in pastoral matters in 2005–2006:


Increased prayers and an intense study of the
confession of faith
– The reception of the sacraments
– Life in mutual charity


After summer a new year starts, so to speak. We have been relaxing, enjoying our holidays in the wonderful, blooming nature and we are renewed and full of new energy and look with optimism to the future. Especially September marks a new time for our children and youngsters, in school, among friends and regarding the coming years of growing up, that are rapidly approaching.
As believers we may also – and should – have a new beginning. There are many possibilities. The Church wants to follow us on our way to “growing up in faith”. She offers us her catechism, proclamation and interpretation of the contents of faith and careful investigation and receptance of these contents. She encourages us to accept eagerly the reinforcements that God gave us in Jesus Christ in order to live a religious life, that is the sacraments. She also sets us a good example by praying. And she encourages us to live a charitable life after the example of Jesus Christ.
We should make all of this a part of our daily lives and practise it. Only in this way the coming work-year will be fruitful. Let us consider what the Church has to offer and be sure to make room for it in our plans.

1. Intense study of the confession of faith
Without professional skills nobody can go through life. Everybody knows that he or she has to study. No one denies that children and youngsters have to go to school. But also after school is finished we have to add to and increase our knowledge so that we keep up with the development in our professional field and can solve our tasks still more efficiently.
This is also the case regarding faith and its contents. The one who doesn’t know it also can not enjoy the fruits of true life of faith. Many of those who don’t take faith seriously simply lack knowledge or are at least not ready to accept ever more instruction. Therefore constant instruction is very important to the faithful.
At first it concerns that the children get to know the contents of faith. Already in childhood the parents should introduce them to it: with stories on the quintessence of faith, Jesus Christ and by showing them the path to life after the precedent of Christ in a charitable way. They also must introduce them to the work of the Church as soon as possible. They must tell their children that Jesus lives there and listens to them. They should also get to know the Saints, especially Mary, mother of Jesus and of us all. Later they should take their children to the instruction that the Church offers. This starts with the preparation for first communion. But also after that the parents should see to it that the children have catechesis lessons regularly. Following that they should take part in Mass with their children. It is also a good experience for them. The preparation for confirmation is very important. It is however not the “final examination” of catechism. For the adolescents namely need special assistance of the Church to reach adulthood without damage. Our priests and sisters therefore try especially hard to guide those young people in a suitable way through those “turbulent” years in their lives. The parents should encourage them to take part in meetings that the parish arranges for youngsters.
Also the grown-ups should see to it that their religious knowledge does not “dry up”, for then their faith also quickly dries up. Therefore we offer courses, lectures and study-groups in the parishes. It should be a matter of course to take part in them and their preparation. This should also attract the attention of our children and youngsters to get acquainted with faith and its contents. Our Church papers and Merki krossins are available to everyone. In them all in the family always find something that suits them, encouraging them to renewed thinking about faith and life with the Church. This was also the aim with the Sunday-sermons, to which we should listen attentively and perhaps discuss afterwards, especially within the family.

2. Prayer
Life in faith does not only revolve around “knowledge”, but also – and even more so – it aims to build up a strong relationship with the center of faith, Jesus Christ. Nobody can call himself a real Christian, unless his relationship with Christ is deep. This is found in prayer.
The prayer should be attended to in the family. No day can pass without common prayer: in the moring and in the evening, before and after meals and in connection with specially important events or decisions. Children should from the beginning know that the prayer is part of their lives. The parents should look at it as their primary duty to teach their children that. They should also learn to pray themselves, especially when they have problems in their lives. This should characterize their future.
We should especially pray in Church. For there God listens to us personally in Jesus Christ, his Son. We should make the visit to Church a normal part of our daily life. We should especially pray to Jesus in the Eucharist. We have emphasized that in the Year of the Eucharist. In addition to our prayer to Jesus, we should also pray to the Saints. That is what they expect. Especially the veneration of Mary, Mother of God, helps us to live according to our faith and to trust in God’s help continually. Of this we can be sure: “Everyone who turns to Mary and trusts her shall not be lost.” The rosary helps us to achieve this, but in it are joined a contemplation of the life of Jesus and an invocation to his Mother.

3. Receiving the Sacraments
Luckily it is a tradition in our society that children are baptized and receive the sacrament of confirmation. That is how it should be. But in daily life we also need the direct grace of redemption and strength from God. That we receive in all the sacraments, especially the Penance and the Eucharist.
Penance makes us able always to make a new start as Christians. It releases us from our trespasses against God and our brothers and sisters and helps us to follow the commandments of God. Prayer-meetings are held reguarly in our parishes. In addition to that we can whenever we like ask a priest to hear our confession. We should make use of that. And we must also encourage our children and youngsters to confess regularly. This should be a source of joy to them.
The receptance of the Eucharist is very important and it should at least be made on Sundays and feast-days. We should always make our plans for these days so that we could attend Mass. The Church also expects us to do that, becuase she knows that without it our faith would not survive. We need the word of the Lord, the prayers of the Church and especially the visit of the Lord into our hearts. We must know that the condition for the receptance of the Holy Eucharist is a really Christian way of life. In this regard regular confession and attendance of Mass are closely related.

4. Life in mutual charity
Another side of life in faith is contained in listening to dogmas and believing them to be true and important, and to take part in beautiful ecclesial ceremonies. But it is worthless if we do not convert those dogmas, and the strengthening that the receptance of the sacraments gives us, into charitable deeds. All too often we live a “double life”: On one hand we are under obligation to the faith of the Church, but on the other we follow the fashionable trends of our secular society in everyday life and seek first and foremost our own profit – also at the cost of our fellow brothers and sisters. That is not the way it should be. We must always try and imitate Our Lord in his selfless love.
First we must do this in the family. There man and woman, parents and children show each other that they only want to meet and associate with each other in love. It is often difficult, since the will of us all is not only good, but it can sometimes be bad. This we should confess and always try to prevent that our bad or selfish tendencies achieve their goals. – But should that happen anyway, we must immediately ask for forgiveness. – The family should be a place of love. This strengthens the marriage and the unity of the family. And it will be clear to children and adolescents that the family is the indispensable basic group and center of our society. This is especially important in our times.
But also in our environment, where we are daily in contact with other people, we should practise charity. Only in charity does the real Christian become known. This charity was the most important reason for the foothold that the Christian faith gained in the world. And it still is.
The Lord taught us – in his words and deeeds – that we first of all should show the poor, the sick and the outcasts in our society charity.Those are the true “beloved of God”. In them Jesus Himselfs meets us. We should meet them with an open mind, be friendly and helpful towards them. This we also have to urge our children to do.

The priests and the sisters encourage us to do this time and time again. They tirelessly bring us the faith, its riches and strengthenings, and make it easier for us to receive the sacraments and encourgae us to live in true charity. We should listen to their calling and make use of their helpfulness.
We should also notice everything that takes part in the “big Church”. In the last months we have certainly done so, when the great pope John Paul II died and his closest co-worker took over from him and called himself Benedict XVI. We should remain faithful to the pope. We should take seriously his leadership of the Church and follow it. In him Our Lord Himself is speaking.
In this way we get continually closer to becoming true Christian people. This will also arouse the interest of other Christian brothers and sisters in this country and encourage them –hopefully – to study the contents of the faith carefully and to gain “fulfillment” of life according to the faith.
May this “working-year” be fruitful and a blessing to you and lead to the strengthening of our faith. I promise you all my prayers so that this may be realized.
 
Jóhannes Gijsen
Bishop of Reykjavík
Reykjavík, August 1, 2005





Advent Letter of
Bishop Jóhannes Gijsen 
2005

Let us decide to make the peace,
which our Saviour offers us,
a reality in our lives.


Christmas is for all, rich and poor, small and great, young and old, the most beautiful feast day of the year.  But why is that so?  It is, first and foremost because that story, which is always enchanting, the story of the birth of Jesus in the stable, on the outskirts of Bethlehem, produces the best of feelings in us.  It awakes in us the desire for peace and justice, mutual understanding, forgiveness and hope, for new beginnings, willingness to
co- operate and be amenable.  In a word, love.

We listen to all this, during the beautiful Christmas liturgy and we try to make it a reality; in our joyful companionship with our family and friends; and even with strangers.

But…… in fact, the Christmas story is not characterised, first and foremost by peace, understanding, hope and love.  Rather, it has all the marks of uncertainty, strain, disappointment and menace.  Even the Church calls us, rather to reflection, vigilance and eagerness to convert.  She helps us to understand how to celebrate a joyful and tranquil feast day , celebrated in complete calmness.  Despite that, both the Bible and the Church speaks about peace, justice, a happy communion with one another, and a new beginning in love.  But in this, we find something else, something deeper than we generally expect, when we hear these words.

This becomes clear, as we listen to the Gospels during the Sundays of Advent.  They tell us, time after time, that we must first decide that our lives must not just pass by, not even pass by as we would wish or plan.  Rather, we must decide that somebody else should make these decisions; that somebody being God.  He is the Lord of our lives.  Before his plans, we should stand open minded, even if they do not appeal to us at first glance, or are in opposition to our wishes and hopes.  Of course, God will offer us peace, joy, happiness and salvation.  But the meaning of these words, we will only understand and experience, if we conform our decisions, feelings and way of thinking, to his way of doing things.

The prophet Isaiah, John the Baptist, Mary and Jesus himself, all speak to us in Advent and show us that the peace of Christmas is not to be taken for granted. They encourage us to wake up from idleness, surrender our self-satisfaction and empty our hearts so that the Word of God and the light of God may fill us.  But this makes a deliberate choice, necessary.  That choice is, that we act according to God´s will, in every area of our lives.  The decision of Mary: “Be it done unto me according to thy word”, should be our example.

This would quickly help us to understand that the peace of Christmas is not directed towards something external, something  based on feelings, something convenient and easy.  Rather, it´s essence is something completely different to what the world thinks it means.  It is not about avoiding divisions, to be in agreement about everything and to be satisfied.  The ideals that our society have strived after for the last 200 years, freedom, equality and brotherhood, sound good, but they are not the foremost goals of the Gospel.  In the first place, it has become clear, that it is not possible to make them an instant reality; and secondly they lead, at best, to a superficial peace, which quickly falls apart.  The peace, which the Saviour offered in Bethlehem, allows war, injustice and hostility to be tolerated; and it even provokes these things.  This is because, the peace which Jesus wanted to give us, is based on faithfulness to the truth and makes self denial and self sacrifice necessary conditions.  That is why it is always attacked.  But anyone who will fulfil the necessary conditions for genuine peace and live accordingly, will find this peace.  This is the same peace that gave Mary and Joseph, who were the first people to receive it, that peace, patience and even the courage and confidence necessary to walk the many difficult paths in following God´s will.

Now, we are at the start of Advent, the time we use to prepare for Christmas.  Let us reflect on whether we will allow the Word of God to touch us and be our constant companion, or whether we will only prepare in a superficial and materialistic way for a successful Christmas.  If we choose the second way, the Christmas peace will be like a soap bubble that disappears quickly.  But if we reflect seriously on the “inner” things, accept the Word of God and live according to it, and improve our habits - just as God expects of us - then real peace will flow into our hearts.  Christmas will then really mean the new beginning of a life full of confidence in God´s guidance; even when the circumstances are anything but peaceful.

May Mary and Joseph be our models, so that we can greet the Child in the Manger, with deep peace in our hearts and worship him and declare that he is the true Prince of Peace.  With this in mind, I wish you all, “a blessed Christmas!”

Jóhannes Gijsen
Bishop of Reykjavik
27 November 2005




Meeting of the

Scandinavian Bishops’ Conference

9th–14th September 2005


A thoroughgoing examination of the pastoral care of immigrants, and the issuing of a short statement on migrants (statement is attached), was the major work undertaken by the Bishops’ during the Autumn General Assembly of the Conference which was held at the Bishop’s House in Reykjavík, Iceland. This had been inspired by the document from the Council for the Pastoral Care of Immigrants containing new legislation and pastoral guidelines for the care of immigrants. The bishops reviewed, in every individual diocese, the need for pastoral care in the various languages which are used and also considered ways of building greater unity among Catholics in our parishes, whatever their nationalities. The bishops reiterated their desicion not to build national parishes and also considered ways in which the ecumenical and interreligious aspects of this work could be emphasized.
With the resignation of Bishop Schwenzer of Oslo and also his resignation as chairman of the Bishops’ Conference, Bishop Anders Arborelius of Stockholm became the new chairman and Bishop Czeslaw Kozon of Copenhagen the new Vice-Chairman of the conference. Bishop Georg Müller of Trondheim became the third member of the standing committee of the Conference.
The Pastoral letter on the family which has occupied much of the conference’s time in the recent past will be issued on December 30th 2005. Translations will be available in other languages besides those of the Nordic countries.
In order to be more effective the Conference decided that in a number of matters concerning social and ethical questions the Conference secretariat will spread information to politicians, governments, etc, rather than each individual bishop doing so. This will always happen in cooperation with the local Bishop.
Bishop Czeslaw Kozon of Copenhagen has prepared a text to be presented at the coming Bishops’ Synod on the Eucharist in October in Rome. This was approved by the Conference.
Reports were also received from various meetings: from the Commission of the Bishops’ Conferences of the European Community (COMECE), particularly concerning questions of euthanasia and bioethics and the meeting of the General Secretaries of the European Bishops’ conferences (CCEE). At the latter the various problems of bioethics were discussed as was the desirability of holding a third European Ecumenical Assembly in Romania in 2007. Bishop Georg Müller of Trondheim is responsible for this apect of the Confernce’s work.
The report from the conference on the question of pastoral care of “street women and trafficking” which was held in Rome in June 2005, was thoroughly discussed. It was decided that the full report would be circulated to each Bishop and eventual concrete measures to be taken would be discussed at the next conference.
The next General assembly of the Bishops’ Conference will be held in Magleås, Denmark 10th–15th March 2006.







Pope Benedict XVI

A blessed shepherd for the Church and the world


“Nomen est omen.”  That means that a name is an omen.  This is especially true for the Pope, chief shepherd of the Catholic Church.  The are good reasons why they choose a new name, when elected.  By this means, they reveal their plans for the future.

This is also true for our new Pope.  He choose the name Benedict XVI.  The pronunciation of the name suggests two meanings: “bene dictus” - “that which is correctly, well and obviously spoken.”  The Pope will speak the right words.  He will offer the truth, in a clear way, without misunderstanding.  It has always been one of his strengths; he has a reputation for and had a strong influence on the Cardinals, that they have seen in him a good candidate for the papacy.  Benedict also means “the blessed one” or “he who acquires a blessing.”  The new Pope wants, first and foremost, to be a man who deserves a blessing - God´s blessing.  This blessing alone can assure and will assure, both individuals, the Church and society; peace and happiness.  God´s blessing can and will change evil to good, war to peace and hopelessness to trust.  Such a blessing makes peace between people and God; between peoples, peace with oneself and one´s fate.  Such a blessing leads to salvation.  This is the task of the new Pope.

Pope Benedict XVI has, himself, pointed out, two important persons in history, in regard to his choice of name:  Pope Benedict XV who lead the Church from 1914 to 1922 and worked especially for peace in the world, peace and order within the Church and renewed the Church´s missionary effort.  The other person is Benedict of Nurcia, who lived in the 5th century, that is at the end of antiquity.  Through the foundation of his Order and his guidance, he was like a solid rock in an Europe that was torn asunder and scattered with the forming of many new nations.  Benedict of Nurcia became the Father of Christian Europe.  “Always seek the will of God,” he said, “and direct your life by reason and respect for God and for the good of your brothers and sisters.  Pray for this and work for this.”  The message of the new Pope is the same.


What may we expect in the light of Pope Benedict´s choice of name?
First, he will continue in the footsteps of his predecessor John Paul II.  He has clearly declared that he will continue to work for peace and justice in the world, unity of all Christians and peaceful accord with the great world religions.  He will continue with these.  Also, he will work for human rights and struggle for the recognition of both faith values and the one true God.  For Christians, faith in Jesus Christ - the One Lord and Saviour - should be the centre and sign of the harmony of the Church.  The ecumenical effort should not be towards a unity based on the smallest common denominator, but the increase in the homecoming of all true Christians into the Father´s house, where there are many rooms and the many rich graces of God await them.

But Benedict XVI will go a different way than his predecessor to reach these goals, based on his temperament, education and work as a theologian.  He is a moderate scientist, but he has a heart.  He has a clear understanding of things.  He sees the decline of culture, which makes both individuals and society, especially in Europe, insecure and weak.  In his homily at the opening of the Consistory, he referred to how much, relativism has become common.  He offers the only real solution and a new beginning:  to confess Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour.  He searches for people in their desert and as the Good Shepherd, leads them out to the peaceful and lush pasture of His Church, which is His body and gives life, abundant life, just as Pope Benedict said at the Papal Installation Mass on the 24th of April.


How will Pope Benedict XVI make this a reality?
First, a person must be clear about their weakness and inability to work for peace, justice and unity.  The Pope looks at himself as a simple workman in the vineyard of the Lord.  There is also a need for meekness, the meekness of the lamb, who allows itself to be lead, and is ready to sacrifice itself for others.  This meekness also characterises the shepherd, to whom the searching, lost person should turn to.  The meekest of all was Jesus.  The Saints followed Him in this.  They are an example for all.  But at the same time, Jesus showed the Saints, an unshakeable trust, in the leadership and power of God.  It becomes clear in the prayer and participation of the liturgy, especially the Mass, which shows both the self sacrifice and the victory over death, which Jesus, our Saviour won.  There we find the foundation and the source of the sure rebirth of every person, who will believe in the true God.

The Pope will offer all this and speak openly in plain words, especially to the youth.  He will call people to faith, to a deep faith of the heart.  As far as faith is concerned, it is a wise position for people to adopt, who know life well; but at the same time, this faith must be lived out, in love of God, through Jesus Christ, to our brothers and sisters and to the Church's communion in the Holy Spirit.  Only  in this way, can individuals, families, races and nations; and so Christianity and other religions, enjoy inner and outer peace and find true unity.

We can be thankful to God, that He has given us, once again - clearly through the power of the Holy Spirit of the Church and the world - a chief shepherd capable of showing clearly, in an attractive and convincing way, appropriate to our time, the salvation which Jesus Christ won.  But for this, he requires, as he has often said, our prayers and co-operation.  Let us promise him that, heartily.


+Jóhannes Gijsen

Reykjavíkurbiskup

Reykjavík, 7. maí 2005






ADVENT MESSAGE OF BISHOP JÓHANNES GIJSEN
2004

"Let us get up and go to meet Jesus!" This is the message of the Church every year at the beginning of the Advent. The word "advent" refers to the coming of the Saviour of the world, who for many centuries was prophesied. But it also announces the new coming of this Saviour at the end of the times. He first came in an unspectacular way - as a child, laying in a crib -, at the end He will come in his glory. During the time between He also reveals Himself. In different ways, but particularly under the signs of bread and wine, which have been transformed into his body and blood. This happens in the Eucharist.

Normally during the month December we look forward to the memory of the first coming of the Saviour. We prepare ourselves - and our environment - to celebrate Christmas, the feast of the child Jesus. We adorn our houses and streets to rejoice this event - although many people direct their attention more to rejoicing themselves and others. The summit has to be Christmas-night. Then we remember the birth of Christ - and we organize a big meal for the whole family.

Also the Church needs to prepare us for the remembrance of this all-overwhelming event. She celebrates it with a rich liturgy. But during the weeks before she first of all calls for conversion. "Awake from your ordinary routine, in which you do not think so much about your final aim", she says. "Look again to Him who may assure it and who shows you the right way to it." And she presents us three persons who were possessed by the coming of the Saviour and who directed their lives completely towards it: the prophet Jesaja, Saint John the Baptist and Mary, the elected mother of Jesus. They underlined the need of conversion to become fit for the meeting the Son of God when He would arrive.

This we have to be aware of, now that we start the advent. We shall not only be filled by care of a nice fitting up of our house, the preparation of a good meal, the purchase of the right gifts for others - also if this is important -, but first of all we shall go into ourselves and clear up our relationship with God. How important is He and are his commandments for us? Also we have to restore and to renew our relationships with other people to be able to celebrate Christmas really in peace, because otherwise we will not be capable to look the little Jesus full in the eyes when we will stand before the crib. A deliberate and sincere confession will be the best concretization of our preparation to Christmas.

But we also have to look further on. We have to consider our life-plan. Is this bordered by our life-time and determined by earthly purposes? Or are we open for the return of our Saviour? Is He the one we always are expecting or do we often forget Him, because our own desires and cares destine our thoughts and acts? The advent calls us to awake from it and to prepare us for the entrance of Him, who will open for us the door to our eternal destination. Also this we have to be aware of. Therefore it would be useful to reserve some time for meditation and for an intensive contact with our Lord during the coming weeks.

This may bring us to the intention to meet Jesus like He lives among us in the actual time. Our Holy Father has in his recent apostolic letter on the occasion of "the Year of the Eucharist" we are celebrating said: "Let us take the time to kneel before Jesus present in the Eucharist, in order to make reparation by our faith and love for the acts of carelessness and neglect, and even the insults which our Saviour must endure in many parts of the world. Let us deepen through adoration our personal and communal contemplation, drawing up aids to prayer inspired by the experience of so many saints, old and new. A fitting introduction to this contemplation may be the prayer of the Rosary, meditating big events of the life of Jesus and his mother who may be our companion and guide" ("Mane Nobiscum Domine", Nr. 18).

These may be the ways of celebrating this Advent and of making it fruitful for a joyful celebrating of Christmas. May we grow into the unity with Christ, our Saviour and Lord who will give us this peace.

+Jóhannes Gijsen
Bishop of Reykjavík
Reykjavík, November 28, 2004


 

Capuchins from Slovakia come to Iceland

A Monastery Will Be Established

The Capuchins are really descendants of St. Francis of Assisi, "the holy pauper", who ignited in so many people - and still does - a genuine love for the crucified Saviour. The name of the congregation derives from the tall, peaked tops that they carry over their chestnut-brown gowns. The Capuchins can not point to any one real "founder" of their congregation. It came into existence in Italy at the beginning of the sixteenth century when a few "Conventionalists" and "Observants" united. Those were the two groups of followers of St. Francis that were recognized as independent "congregations" within the Church. This new organization tried, even more than the existing ones, to follow the love of the cross and the poverty that St. Francis had shown, and it was soon approved by the Church as an independent congregation. It attracted many young people - and also many followers of the existent Congregation of St. Francis. Within one century the members of this congregation had increased to 10,000 and in the middle of the 18th century the number of Capuchins had reached 30,000. The spread all over the world, both because they appeared as renewers within the Catholic faith - after the Reformation -and as missionaries in the "New World" (America, Africa and Asia). Because of the revolutionary situation in the world around 1800 and the agression of the states in their dealings with the Church, may Capuchin monasteries disappeared but from the latter half of the 19th century their number began to increase again. There are about 12,000 monks of this Franciscan order, considered to be the most rigorous of those orders, in the world today.

The Capuchins want to be real "monks". This means that they devote themselves to the consideration of the gospel, they live in communities (albeit small ones), practice poverty, both in their life-styles, buildings and the equipment of their houses and churches. They do practical labour, look after the poor and the sick and they also preach. There are both brothers and fathers in the congregation and they are all equal. Nowadays Capuchins often take charge of parishes, but usually in districts where the Church is not "rich" or in communities that are not influential. The monks are characterized by their great simplicity, their cheerfulness, a devout faith and a sincere love for Jesus the Crucified. They accept everyone with an open mind, especially children and those that live on the "edges" of society.

The Capuchins have been active for a long time in Slovakia. But when the Communist government closed off all the monasteries there, their activities ceased. However, soon after the changes in 1990 a new chapter of the congregation was established in the country. Now there are about 100 members of that congregation. They would like to go to a "new country" and for that purpose they have chosen Iceland. Last June the provincial and one of the monks came to Iceland to get themselves aquainted with the situation of the Church and to study the possibilities of taking part in building it up with us. The visited the east part of the country and felt that the development there looked promising. They declared themselves ready to take over the pastoral service in the region, both for the Catholics already there and for those who could be expected to move there in the future.

The first Capuchin arrives in Iceland in November 2004. His name is Fr. David Tencer (he came to Iceland last June). For the time being he will live in the priests' house in Breiðholt in Reykjavík. He will immediately start learning Icelandic. At the same time he will assist the parish priests, Fr. Denis O'Leary, with his work, but he will also from time to time fly to the Eastern-fjords to read Holy Mass and visit the inhabitants. He will also consider the possibilities for establishing a monastery there. In July 2005 another Capuchin will arrive - and later on the third one, since their communities must contain at least three members. They will also have to start learning Icelandic. In the fullness of time they will move to the East-fjords and then they should be able to establish their monastery.

With the arrival of those Capuchins a real monastic order will be re-established in Iceland, and this time a monastery of a "begging-order", since the Franciscans are all begging-monks. We are very glad because of this growth in our Church and pray that the priests and brothers can as soon as possible realize their dream among us and at the same time take over the pastoral services for the other - probably numerous - inhabitants of the eastern part of Iceland.
 




Three new sisters arrive in Iceland

"We are the Glorious Mysteries", said the sisters laughing, meaning that their names refer to the three last Glorious Mysteries of the Rosary. They are Sister Pentecostes, Sister Assumption and Sister Reina de los Cielos. They belong to the "Institute of the Servants of the Lord and the Virgin of Materá", but we call them Sisters of Mary (Maríusystur). They will be settling down in Jófríðarstaður in Hafnarfjörður and in the future they will work in the parish of St. Joseph. Next January one sister from Brazil will join them as well as two priests from Argentina.

No one can miss the sisters, but their colourful grey and blue habits are very obvious and so is the infectuous joy that emanates from those young nuns.

There was quite a feast in Hafnarfjörður on the 12th of September 2004 when the sisters were welcomed and many people assisted with the preparation. In the Mass music from all over the world was prominent, both vocal and instrumental. After Mass there was a "Festival of nationalities" in the parish-hall in Hafnarfjörður, where Catholics from all over the world, living in Iceland, presented some examples of their culture. There were dancers from Thailand and singers from the Filippines among many other things. The sisters also sang some songs of their own and joined in with the others. Those present also had the opportunity to sample some delicious dishes, from many countries, that had been prepared beforehand.

Finally the chairman of the Catholic lay-society in Hafnarfjörður welcomed the sisters.

The arrival of the sisters in Hafnarfjörður is very promising. May God bless their work among us.
 
 


Our Diocese gets it´s own Court
In our society, it is normal that power is divided, so that the law makers, the law enforcers and those who judge according to the law are not the same people, rather each have their own institution and staff.  In practice, there is a lot of contact between these institutions: The power of the state, executive power is supported usually by a parliamentary majority - legislative authority; judicial power - the judges, make decisions according to the laws that the parliament has passed, and they are appointed by the state.

In the Catholic Church such a division of power, basically does not exist.  The Pope is the law maker for the Church as a whole and the bishops are the law makers for the local churches (dioceses), governors and judges.  But both the Pope and the bishops are obliged in all things to be faithful to Holy Scriptures and to the laws that God has revealed in them.  They may not change these laws but only interpret them and adapt them to the current circumstances.  In addition, the bishop is bound to the decisions of the Church´s court.  He must also take account of the advice of his priests, even though he makes the final decision himself.  In regard to governing, the bishop sometimes lets others govern on his behalf, especially his proxy (vicar general).  Parish priests also have a certain independence.  In dealing with matters of law and order, the bishop is to appoint a legal representative (officialis) and judges.  They make judgments on the basis of general legal procedure but acting according as they see correct in their opinion.

The Church´s court orders that :"Each bishop who governs a diocese shall name a representative for the handling of legal matters (officialis) who has, because of his office, general judicial power in the diocese.  This representative (officialis) may not be the same one who is the general proxy (vicar general)."  (See CIC 1983, 1420:1).  The"officialis" should be a priest with a licence in church (canon) law.  The bishop should nominate three judges to assist him and they should have a good knowledge of  canon law.  The judges and the officialis make up the court of the diocese.

The majority of these members of the court should be priests.  The bishop appoints them for a fixed time period - usually for five years - but they can be reappointed many times.  The bishop cannot remove them from office without a serious valid reason.

The court of the diocese deals with disagreements in regard to sacred ordination or marriage.  In cases of a disputed ordination or an application for the annulment of marriage, the bishop shall appoint a defender of the bond (defensor vinculi) who shall propose and present to the court and indicate everything possible which would block the contesting of the ordination or marriage.  The bishop shall also appoint an official to protect the common good of the Church which a particular case could affect (promoter justitiae), and also a notary.

The court of the diocese decides the validity of sacred ordination or marriage.  First the parties are interviewed and also the relevant witnesses.  An"investigating judge" (auditor) can do this.  The bishop shall propose the parties and witnesses to the advocate (advocatus).  The acts of the interviews, and the reports of the witnesses and experts if necessary (for example doctors and psychologists), are presented to the court of the diocese.  The court investigates the documents and asks the defender of the bond about his opinion.  The court can, if necessary, ask more questions of the advocate and of the witnesses and so decide the sentence (decided according to the majority of the votes).  Then all the documents are sent to another court for the diocese which the Holy See appoints.  If the sentence of this second court agrees with the first, then it becomes legally binding and the parties will be informed.  If the sentence of this second court disagrees with the first, then recourse must be made to a third court which in most cases would be the highest court in the Church, the"Sacra Romana Rota".  It´s decision is final.

In Reykjavík diocese, there has not been, until now, a court of this type.  Disagreements regarding marriage here have been, first of all, presented to the court in the diocese of Oslo in Norway and then presented to the court of the archdiocese of Westminster in England.  This arrangement often was problematic because of the various languages involved, which caused long delays.

So our bishop in Reykjavík turned to the bishop of Oslo and the Holy See for a solution.  Eventually, the bishop in Munster, Germany, declared himself ready to"loan" our bishop the needed officialis, three judges, one defender of the bond and one notary, who all have a lot of experience and knowledge of church law and languages.  These people have been appointed by our bishop to be part of the new court of the diocese of Reykjavík.  The second court will be in the diocese of Munster itself, with various judges involved.  The bishop of Reykjavík has appointed some priests from here to be"promoter justitiae" (protector of the common good), investigative judge and advocate.

Thus, finally, Reykjavík diocese has it´s own court which deals especially with cases of dispute and annulment of marriage in a capable way and reasonable time.  This ensures the parties concerned of the rights they are entitled to, in regard to the handling of their case.
 

Members of the court of Reykjavík diocese:

Court representitive (officialis): Monsignor Martin Hulskamp, lic.theol., lic.jur.can.
Judges: Rev. Erasmus Tripp OSB, lic.phil.
Rev. Michael Wiemuth, representitive of the bishop´s court.
Beatrix Laukemper-Isermann, dr.theol., lic.jur.can.
Vígsluverjandi (defensor vinculi): Rev. Alfred Völler MSC, próf.dr.theol.
Notary: Anne Muller.
Protector of the common good (promotor justitiae) Rev. Ágúst George SMM, proxy of the bishop.
Investigating judge (auditor): Rev. Jakob Rolland, lic.jur.can.
Advocate: Rev. Jurgen Jamin, dipl.theol.

Addresses of the court of Reykjavík diocese:
In Reykjavík; Hávallgata 14, 101 Reykjavík, phone 552-5388.
In Munster; Horsterberg 11, D-48143 Munster, phone 0043-2514956037.





Caring for life

PASTORAL LETTER
FROM THE NORDIC BISHOPS CONFERENCE
ON MEDICAL CARE
AT THE FINAL STAGES OF LIFE


Life is a precious gift. Throughout the centuries this conviction has been the inspiration for many to defend and protect the weakest members of society. This is especially the case in the field of healthcare where Christians have found a meaningful way to assist their neighbour and to bear witness to the love God has for all his people.

In the Nordic counties we have an advanced medical care system that meets our requirements for medical treatment. However the expectations of society for even better care and quality of life, as well as the astounding achievements made in the field of medical science, present us with new challenges. This is especially the case regarding medical care at the final stages of life and also regarding the issue of euthanasia. These questions are and will continue to become increasingly topical. We, the catholic bishops of the Nordic countries, would like to shed light upon these issues based on the message of the Gospel and the tradition of the Catholic Church.

In this letter we will first of all unfold and analyse the situation today in society and in healthcare. Subsequently the answers given by Revelation to ³the eternal questions" will be presented. We will go on to develop a theological analysis of the situation by expounding the teaching of the Church on these questions. Finally a number of suggestions will be presented, which hopefully can promote respect for the sick and the dying in our Nordic countries.

1. Social background

1. 1
Demographic development

During the last hundred years great advances have been made in improving and prolonging human life. As a result of this scientific and technical revolution, the advances made in medical science, the mastering and control of many dangerous illnesses, better hygiene and food, the average life expectancy has increased. Towards the end of the 19th century a citizen of our countries had an expected lifespan of 50 years. Today we have an average life expectancy of about 78 years, statistically among the highest in the world.

Higher standards of living have also lead to lower birth rates. While fewer children are being born and individuals live longer, the populations of our societies are becoming older. The percentage of the population of the Nordic countries over the age of 65 is now 15 percent and is expected to rise continually. In fifty years as much as 45 percent of the Nordic population could be older than 65 years. Certainly, developments in medical science, especially in preventive medicine, genetics, surgery and cancer research will lead to even longer life. But since death is an inevitable fact in human life, questions regarding medical care at the final stages of life will increase in importance and topicality.

1. 2
The changed attitude within society towards death

During the course of history the attitude of our Nordic societies towards death has changed. In the past death was seen as a natural part of life and always close at hand due to the risk of dying while giving birth, infant mortality, accidents at work and many epidemic illnesses. In most cases the sick were taken care of at home. They were a part of a social network that generally was responsible for human care and dignity. When people died there were rites, symbols and actions, especially funerals, which belonged to the culture. Death was a part of life and the dead were honoured.

With the advances and improvements in modern medicine the moment of death is no longer seen to coincide with the moment the heart ceases to beat. Modern intensive care has made it possible to prolong life in a way that in the past was seen as insurmountable. The process of dying has thus been prolonged and can to a great extent be controlled. In the past illnesses and diseases which led to death within a short period of time can now many times be treated. Moreover, today with the help of heart and lung machines or artificial organs life can be sustained in a mechanical way. These possibilities bring the following questions to a head: What is life? What is the meaning of suffering? What is death and when exactly does one die? Even other difficult questions are brought to the fore: Are we always obliged to sustain life as long as possible? Or is it sometimes allowed to discontinue medical treatment to allow a patient to die? Are we allowed to ease a patient¹s severe pain and accept that his life will thus be shortened?

When intensive care was developed during the 1960's it was a clear and obvious fact that the first priority of medical care was to save life. Patients received intensive treatment with an abundance of technical apparatus that certainly sustained life but which also often entailed that a patient¹s spiritual and psychological needs were not seen as important. Death became institutionalised and individualised, ie. moved from the home to the more anonymous environment of a hospital where a patient often awaited death without the presence or help of relatives. This resulted in that death, for many, became an unknown reality. Even today various studies show that only one in ten people aged twenty-five have experienced the death of someone close to them. Death is becoming an abstraction, something that does not exist and thus something we need not concern ourselves with. One speaks even about the genesis of history first ³free-from-death generation". It is only when accidents and catastrophes occur that death receives greater attention.

In recent years the intensive technical treatment of the incurably sick and of dying patients, which characterised medical care at the end of the 1900's, has been questioned. We have seen that questions regarding the quality of life are just as important - and in some cases more important - for patients than access to effective medical treatment. The same studies, as mentioned above, show that an increasing number of people die at home, in old people's homes or other specific forms of housing. The same studies show that relatively few people die alone. There is a positive and increased awareness that death is an important and difficult process in a person¹s life in which one needs other people's support and human warmth. But since many elderly people live alone and death for many is a long process, these people are still very vulnerable. During the last few years it has become clear that the national health system does not always give elderly people the care they need.

1. 3
The changed task of medical care

Modern medicine began with the Greek Hippocrates of Kos (c. 460-377 BC). Traditionally it has been distinguished by three characteristics: 1) it is free from political and religious affiliations, 2) it is founded on scientifically proven methods, 3) the work of doctors is regulated by independent professional ethics, consisting of firm obligations and prohibitions. According to Hippocratic ethics, a doctor has a personal responsibility, if possible, to cure, often to relieve but always to console his patient, but also to refrain from dangerous, harmful or lethal forms of treatment like abortion or euthanasia, even if the patient himself requests it.

Modern medical care challenges this view regarding the roll of the doctor and the purpose of medicine. The close proximity, which existed in earlier times between doctor and patient, is being in many ways replaced by a developed and sophisticated technocracy and bureaucracy. Certainly the patient generally receives appropriate care but the existential and ethical questions, which may arise in relation to his treatment, are seldom given sufficient attention. Due to the demands made for greater efficiency and the priority given to economic issues within the healthcare system medical care workers are often forced to work at a high tempo and thus find it difficult to view patients as fellow human beings. When the distance between doctor and patient increases, the different and varied fields of application given to medicine are on the increase and when the general public gains clearer insights into how the healthcare system is run, there is a risk that medical care can become an ideology, ie. the risk that it becomes an instrument in fostering fixed individual, social or political goals.

In our multicultural context it can be difficult to agree on how we together can resolve ethical issues. However, we may never be content with accepting the lowest common denominator as a norm and delegating to each individual the right to rule over life itself. When we in our society wish to have a moral foundation, we must learn from the experience and wisdom, which are conveyed by the traditions that from the beginning contributed to strengthen and secure the fundamental values of society. Thus, this letter is not just meant for the Catholic Christians of the Nordic countries. We will also explain to other Christians and to all those of good will how our own tradition wrestles with questions of life and death and how it in theory and praxis can contribute to defend and protect the inviolability of human life.




2. The testimony of the Bible

The biblical view of life has as its starting point that God created life and finds joy in it. It is this that gives life its value and dignity.

2. 1
The Old Testament


Man is created in the image and likeness of God (Gen 1:27). But his awareness of being related to God developed rather slowly throughout the history of Israel. At the beginning of his long journey in faith, man becomes very soon aware that he is alive and that this physical existence is in itself of great dignity. In many ways the Bible speaks about the eternal value of life and of man's gratitude to God for the great gift he has been given. He rejoices that he is not dead and that he can praise God. His continued existence is seen by him as proof of God's blessing. Death entails that the service of worship which life is, is broken. He passes into a meaningless shadowy existence, Scheol, where he no longer can praise God. Therefore the psalmist cries:

What profit would my death be, my going to the grave? Can dust give you praise or proclaim your truth? (Ps 30:10)

This insight that man is called to a life with God comes successively. If Israel fears God and keeps his laws and commandments long life is promised to coming generations (Deut 6:2). Man is exhorted to make a fundamental moral standpoint: "See, I have set before you this day life and good, death and evil" (Deut 30:15).

Life and goodness belong together. Without life there are no prerequisites for goodness and for all the other positive values of life, how unpretentious they may be. However, as we all are well aware, life is not always happiness and bliss. Due to the transitoriness of human life we come into contact with its imperfection, which is especially expressed in sickness, suffering and death. The Bible bears witness to the constant experience of the suffering person. Holy Writ does not paint a pretty picture of human existence. Instead it reminds us that misfortune indiscriminately befalls the believer as well as the non-believer, the virtuous as well as evildoers. Job, God's virtuous and faithful servant, experienced his due share of misfortune and sorrow. The Book of Job portrays suffering in a rich and succinct manner. In one passage Job says:

"Why is light given to him that is in misery, and life to the bitter in soul, who long for death, but it comes not, and dig for it more than for hid treasures; who rejoice exceedingly, and are glad, when they find the grave? Why is light given to a man whose way is hid, whom God has hedged in? For my sighing comes as my bread, and my groanings are poured out like water. For the thing that I fear comes upon me, and what I dread befalls me. I am not at ease, nor am I quiet; I have no rest; but trouble comes." (Job 3:20-26)

Even in the abyss of suffering, man can find God. In his vulnerability he becomes aware that he cannot save himself. He needs help from somewhere else. Slowly Israel deepens her insight that the covenant she entered into with the Lord is not meant to secure the people's political success. Instead Israel is to bear witness to salvation in a deeper way for other lands and peoples. Through the prophets the people of God learn to understand that temporary setbacks, suffering and even death do not mean that God has abandoned them. God, who is almighty and merciful, will, in the end, defeat death. Yes, there is hope. Nothing is lost in God's plan of salvation. Not even death is an obstacle for God.

"Thy dead shall live, their bodies shall rise. O dwellers in the dust, awake and sing for joy! For thy dew is a dew of light, and on the land of the shades thou wilt let it fall" (Is 26:19).

2. 2
The New Testament

Jesus Christ, the Saviour of the world, fulfils God's promise of a new creation. He is truly the One who is "life" itself and "the light of all men" (Joh 1:4). By becoming man God wished to show us how our lives should be. When Jesus Christ dies and rises again death is annihilated and through baptism we are partakers in this mystery and are part of his life. In Christ we are no longer subject to the realms of death.

During his earthly existence Jesus defended and supported life in many ways. He heals the sick, he forgives sinners, he consoles the grieved and even gives life to many who have died. Furthermore, he teaches his disciples to dissociate themselves from violence and to treat all people equally, no matter their origin, faith or way of life. He is always in the service of life and shows in his actions what he promised in words: he has come: "that we may have life, and have it abundantly" (Joh 10:10).

Even though Jesus was God, he does not act as if he were superior, but as a fellow human being. He can rid the world of calamity, illness and death but, instead, he subjects himself to these conditions in order to share our humanity. As it is written about Christ in the letter to the Hebrews: "For because he himself has suffered and been tempted, he is able to help those who are tempted" (Heb 2:18). By his suffering and death he voluntarily took upon himself the whole of humanity's individual and collective failures and weaknesses. On the Cross, Jesus came to know man's experience of hopelessness when he exclaimed: "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" (cf Ps 22:2; Matt 27:46; Mark 15:34). He is there with all those who suffer. The Cross reveals God's love and care. Hopelessness and death do not have the last word. By his resurrection on the third day Jesus unveiled for us the victory of life and the meaning and goal of human life. Man is not meant for the grave but called to share in the glory of God for all eternity. Jesus wanted to continue his work on earth. Therefore he called his disciples and gave them the role of leadership among believers. Jesus gave them this exhortation: "Heal the sick, raise the dead, cleanse lepers, cast out demons. You received without paying, give without pay" (Matt 10:8). In the Acts of the Apostles we read how the disciples after Jesus' death and resurrection, heal the sick as a sign of salvation through him. Man is not at the mercy of blind fate, but is called to enter into a new relationship with God where bodily and spiritual health is a sign of the coming of the kingdom of God. In Christ the whole of creation finds itself in a state of transformation where death and corruption constantly are pushed aside in order to make room for a new creation. Therefore Paul writes: "For this perishable nature must put on the imperishable, and this mortal nature must put on immortality. When the perishable puts on the imperishable, and the mortal puts on immortality, then shall come to pass the saying that is written: "Death is swallowed up in victory. ' "O death, where is thy victory? O death, where is thy sting?'" (1 Cor 15:53-55).

In summary: the Bible teaches us that life is something good and desirable which God has given to us as a gift and over which he alone rules. Human life is thus inviolable. At the same time we also learn to hope for something better that will come. We are called to eternal life. Our biological existence here on earth is thus not an absolute good. Life need not be prolonged at all costs and it can be given as a gift for the benefit of others. Jesus cured many but he himself died for us on the Cross in order to win for us the Kingdom of God and to prepare a place for us in the embrace of the Father. The disciples continue in the name of Christ to assist the sick and the weak but they themselves are prepared to die in order to bear witness to life after death.




3. The Christian view of medical care

The Church has always preached about works of mercy as a way for the faithful to imitate Christ and to show Christian love in concrete actions. By giving food to the hungry, water to the thirsty, clothes to the naked, dwelling to the stranger and care to the sick we bear witness, just as the first Christians did, that God loves all people and that his kingdom is among us. But since we meet Christ in the needy and the suffering, we who help are not better than those who receive help. He who takes care of a fellow human being is a disciple of Christ who said: "I was sick and you visited me" (Matt 25:36).

Care of the sick must therefore be seen as a meeting of equal persons where both he who administers care and he who receives care enrich each other. In this meeting spontaneous reactions arise which we all recognise as an expression of our natural tendency to help people in need and our natural reaction to trust the sense of responsibility of other people and their professional competence. When these positive and spontaneous reactions or "manifestations of life" take place mutual trust and confidence between the people concerned arise and it is this which is the foundation of medical care.

3. 1
The dignity of the patient

A patient may never be seen only as "a case" or be reduced to a body that must be treated. Because every individual has an inherent dignity, a patient is first of all a fellow human being. Therefore the patient, if it is possible, or his relations, must be informed and consulted before any treatment involving him commences or is discontinued and also when medical tests are to be taken. A patient must be seen as the vulnerable human being he is and thus receive help in the difficult situation in which he finds himself when he becomes seriously ill. Medical treatment must be seen from an holistic perspective which embraces the personal needs of the patient.

3. 2
Then dignity and vocation of medical care workers

Doctors and nurses may never be regarded only as a means to be used by someone else. They are not just professional and skilled workers paced at the disposal of society or individual patients. According to the Christian position these people have a special vocation and are entrusted with the great responsibility of caring for ill people. Included in this responsibility is an ethical form well tried by experience - the Hippocratic tradition - that strengthens them in their commitment to the service of human life. This ethical tradition within the medical profession must be respected. Doctors and nurses have "a grave and clear obligation to oppose [any actions that are contrary to the ethical tradition within medical care] by conscientious objection", especially abortion and euthanasia. We appreciate the initiatives which have been taken in many of our dioceses to found associations and networks of Catholic doctors. These associations and networks can give our doctors an excellent opportunity to exchange experiences, to gain further education in ethics and to enter more deeply into their Christian identity in the service of life.

3. 3
Other concerned parties

Finally, it is part of the Christian position regarding medical care to also take into consideration any other concerned parties. Medical care is not an isolated reality that only touches the life of the patient and the medical staff. It is also a part of a greater context. After the patient himself, those who bear the main responsibility for the well being of the patient are his relatives. It is important that these people are given the opportunity to get all necessary help from society when they need it in order to care for their relative at home. If this is not possible, then hospitals and medical care establishments must implement measures allowing relatives the opportunity of visiting as often as is possible for them and, if they so wish, allowing them to actively partake in the medical care given to the patient.

Everything that takes place in our hospitals and medical care establishments also concerns many other people, both directly and indirectly. For example, the general public's trust and confidence in medical care are jeopardised when immoral treatments are accepted and if one cannot trust that doctors and nurses always put the well being of the patient first. It is also important to be reminded that the resources given to medical care are limited and that there are also other areas which are of importance for the common good of society, eg. schools, social work, aid to developing countries, research, culture, care of the handicapped and care of the elderly. Health must, therefore, be seen as one of the many values that society must promote. It is not the only one. One must ask oneself if it is acceptable from a Christian perspective that more and more money is invested in order to meet our growing demands for better health and quality of life when other people in our world lack even the most basic necessities of life.

The Church presupposes an holistic view regarding medical care. One should not only care for the patient's physical well being but also his psychological and spiritual needs. Man is not just a body and does not live "on bread alone" (Matt 4:4). Man is a person. Freedom and self fulfilment are values that must be protected. This implies that neither patient nor doctor and medical care workers are to be subjected to political pressure or undue scientific ambitions. They may not be lead into acting unethically by subjecting either the sick or the healthy for oppression. One has always to view the issue of health from a perspective that proceeds from respect for and love of every human being.




4. Questions in connection to medical care at the final stages of life

According to the Christian faith death is not the end of existence but a transition to a new form of life. "For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life" (Joh 3:16). Therefore all those who die in Christ can look forward to seeing God face to face. None the less the process of dying, just as the process of being born, can be very painful. The dying person can experience fear and anxiety since he is faced with an unknown reality and begins to lose his ability to breathe, to perceive and to exist in space and time. Therefore it is important that a dying person is surrounded by human warmth and care, that he is given all necessary spiritual guidance and comfort and has qualified medical treatment at hand, especially for the alleviation of pain.

In the Sacrament of the Sick the Church offers unsurpassed grace and comfort. This sacrament is not only meant for those who are at the brink of death but can also be received by those who are seriously ill, or those who feel weak due to the advancement of years. Its principal grace "is one of strengthening, peace and courage to overcome the difficulties that go with the condition of serious illness or the frailty of old age" (Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 1520). It is important to give the sick members of our parishes the possibility of receiving the sacraments of reconciliation, communion and anointing of the sick. The responsibility of spiritually accompanying and comforting the dying is not just that of the priest. Relatives, friends, medical staff and other fellow human beings can by their very presence at the side of the sick and, eg. reading passages from Sacred Scripture, be a source of great comfort.

4. 1
Alleviation of pain

Human life is transitory and therefore, unavoidably, involves a certain amount of pain and suffering. God does not desire that we should suffer; therefore we are not to consciously look for physical or psychological trials. None the less, when such trials occur they are given meaning in the life of a Christian. Through our trials we can be united with Christ who suffered for us and who in a mysterious way still suffers together with his Church. Therefore the apostle Paul could write: "Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I complete what is lacking in Christ's afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church" (Col 1:24). He who suffers can thus offer up his discomfort or afflictions for the sake of someone else and by his prayers be united with and pray for other people who are being tested. Therefore a patient can of his own accord refrain from accepting treatment for the alleviation of pain. However one may never come to the conclusion that every ill patient would make this choice.

Severe pain can weaken a person's courage, weaken his life of prayer and in other ways be an obstacle in receiving appropriate care at the final stages of life. Therefore the Church teaches that doctors are to provide a high standard of treatment for the alleviation of pain and assume that patients who cannot give their consent would request this treatment. It is true that treatment of patients with analgesic drugs can in rare cases shorten their lives. This risk can be tolerated under the condition that the prescribed doses are within the limits for what is seen as a high standard of medical praxis and that the intention is no other than the alleviation of pain.

We hereby wish to emphasize the importance of a high standard of palliative care at the final stages of life. This care, which aims to alleviate the pains of illness and to integrate the patient's physical, psychosocial and spiritual needs, ought to be an obvious element in medical treatment, given to all those who need it, started at the appropriate time and pursued until the patient passes away. No patient who suffers from an incurable illness is to be seen as "fully treated" from a medical point of view.

4. 2
Termination of intensive medical treatment

There are other situations where a patient receives intensive care and his life is maintained mechanically, eg. respirators. The question then arises if it is morally acceptable to discontinue intensive treatment and allow the patient to die if his health cannot be restored.

According to the tradition and teaching of the Church, a balance must always be achieved between the proposed method of treatment and its benefits and the possible negative consequences, including all medical risks, pain or fear. According to this teaching a patient is in principle obliged to allow himself be receive treatment and a doctor obliged to provide the treatment - if the treatment has a reasonable chance of restoring the patient's health and does not entail all too many negative factors. However a doctor is not simply morally obliged to begin or continue treatment if the medical benefits are negligible in proportion to other pains or difficulties, and if therapy only prolongs the process of death. The decision to possibly terminate a life sustaining treatment obviously must be taken only after consultation with the patient, with his relations if he is not conscious and if necessary with other specialists. Irrespective of the choice made, the regular care of the patient must continue. To terminate medical treatment in these or similar cases is not a form of "passive" euthanasia or mercy killing.

4. 3
Euthanasia

Even when a patient is irrevocably in the process of dying and there is no possibility of saving his life, a doctor is the protector and servant of life. This also applies to those close to the patient. However, there are many voices in society which advocate that a doctor ought to be allowed to intentionally kill a patient if the patient requests it or gives his permission.

In the strict sense of the word, euthanasia means "an action or omission which of itself and by intention causes death, with the purpose of eliminating all suffering. Euthanasia's terms of reference, therefore, are to be found in the intention of the will and in the methods used". A request for mercy killing is often grounded in the need for dialogue, in depression, in a state of anxiety when faced with death or the fear of being an overwhelming encumbrance to the medical system or a burden for relatives. These fears and apprehensions must naturally be taken seriously. Medical care workers must therefore be close to the suffering patient and by loving care give support both to the patient himself and his family. The position of palliative care must therefore be strengthened so that medical care workers become more qualified in this field and thus be of benefit to the patient. However, not all patients who need treatment for the alleviation of pain receive it and, unfortunately, are not always received in an appropriate manner. Compared to other more prestigious medical fields, eg. genetics or surgery, palliative care is still given low priority and neglected. Politicians, medical care workers and relatives have thus an important task to make sure that in many different ways the final stages of life also become a meaningful period in the life of each person. Studies have also confirmed that which medical care workers, pastors of souls and relatives already ascertained: the final stages of life can also be a time full of unexpected possibilities, and even become a source of joy both for the terminally ill patient and those close to him.

In the ethical debate it is often argued that euthanasia should be allowed since every person has the right to decide over his own body and his own life. Receiving help to commit suicide or to kill another human being is, however, not a personal matter or private affair. Man is a social being who is part of a community. What we do with our bodies and our lives concerns others. Other people also need to be protected. Euthanasia is an immoral action because it violates the bodily integrity of its victims, it violates the person who has to perform this deed and violates other people especially the handicapped, who despite difficult trials in life wish to continue living a worthy life. These people, who often feel extremely vulnerable in the debate on euthanasia, need the support of society by, among things, hearing it clearly proclaimed that life is always inviolable and worthy to be lived, despite one's medical condition or supposed social advantage. Owing to all these reasons it is important that human life is protected right up to the moment of death and that euthanasia is not allowed by law. Besides the fact that euthanasia is contrary to the ethics of medical care workers, it does not take the possibilities of palliative care into consideration and that violating the integrity of the human person is also a serious sin against God who has commanded us not to kill ( Ex 20:13; Deut 5:17). Therefore Pope John Paul II, in his encyclical Evangelium vitae, confirms, "In harmony with the Magisterium of my Predecessors and in communion with the Bishops of the Catholic Church, I confirm that euthanasia is a grave violation of the law of God, since it is the deliberate and morally unacceptable killing of a human person."

4. 4
Terminal sedation

Lately in our Nordic countries a new form of euthanasia is being discussed. The term "terminal sedation" is used to describe an action that involves a doctor anaesthetising a dying patient and discontinuing all medical treatment until death occurs. In these cases death usually occurs within a few days and up to a week after being anaesthetised. Advocates of this action maintain that it is an acceptable and legal form of euthanasia because it contains two elements that are allowed today: the administering of an anaesthetic and the termination of treatment.

Since the intention and purpose of this action is to kill the patient, terminal sedation should be seen as a regular form of euthanasia and thus forbidden. The distinguishing factor between this method and other methods where a patient's live is intentionally brought to a close, is the instruments that are used. Terminal sedation is in itself also problematic and uncertain. Medical praxis has shown that patients can experience pain and discomfort even when anaesthetised. In a situation like this terminal sedation would irrevocably deprive the patient of the possibility of awaking and requesting help. To deny a patient the possibility of communicating with those around him in such a definitive way, and possibly changing his opinion on how he should be treated, is seriously unethical.

4. 5
Donation of organs, tissue and cells

From a biological point of view death is not an instantaneous event but more or less a prolonged process in which the unitary and integrated functions of the body gradually decline. In the past the moment of death was normally linked to the moment the heart ceased to beat. The possibility of sustaining a person's blood circulation using artificial means has made this assumption problematic and brought to the fore the insight that a person's identity is foremost connected to his potential or his actual possibility of being self-aware, of reflecting and of communicating with others. When this faculty is irrevocably lost (what is usually termed brain death) a person can also be regarded as dead. The Church does not use medical criteria to define death, but through theological and philosophical reasoning has arrived at the same conclusion as medical science, which implies that she implicitly accepts the so called brain death criterion. The Church's competence lies in theology and philosophy. Therefore the Holy Father said recently: "In this regard, it is helpful to recall that the death of the person is a single event, consisting in the total disintegration of that unitary and integrated whole that is the personal self. It results from the separation of the life-principle (or soul) from the corporal reality of the person."

These theoretical questions are of great relevance today due to the possibilities we have of, among other things, being able to make use of the organs, tissues and cells of a deceased person and transplanting them in order to help seriously ill people. With the great shortage of donated organs etc. which we have today in the Nordic Countries, this possibility of saving other peoples' lives, by donating our bodies after death, should be welcomed. The donation of an organ can be a person's last free act of love on earth. Therefore we encourage all Catholics in our dioceses to promote the culture of life by taking a definite position in this important question.

The donation of an organ should even be seen within the field of medical care as a free act of love that embraces the whole person. Therefore the consent to be an organ donor is to be confirmed clearly with the help of a high standard of medical praxis before any surgical act on the dead body takes place. It is also important that the body of the deceased donor is treated with respect.




5. The contribution of the Church to medical care in the Nordic Countries

Since the time when the Nordic countries became Christian, the Church has been an important social figure in society and has always assisted the poor, the sick, prisoners and other marginalised people. This is especially the case with religious orders of sisters who have conveyed the care of the Church to the sick and weak here in the North.

5. 1
Catholic medical care in the Nordic Region
After the reformation, the Catholic Church returned to the Nordic countries during the 19th and 20th centuries. Gradually it made itself know in different areas of society. This is seen most clearly when the Church manifested itself through its special work for the sick and the elderly. Up to our own time religious congregations of sisters and brothers have taken upon themselves the responsibility of looking after seriously ill people and the dying by giving them security and comfort. In many ways they have worked to relieve their pains and helped them to bear their fear and anguish. Moreover they have tried to help patients be reconciled to God by receiving the sacraments: confession, Holy Eucharist and anointing of the sick. Today it is not usually religious sisters and brothers who exercise this apostolate, but individual catholic doctors and nurses in public hospitals and medical care establishments. Together with other people of good will they engage themselves in giving love and aid to the sick and the dying so that they with dignity can enter into eternal life.

5. 2.
New initiatives

In order to help terminally ill people be treated with care and respect for God as the Lord of Life, several houses for hospice care have been established under Catholic and ecumenical management.




6. Summary

In this pastoral letter we the bishops of the Nordic countries, have attempted to draw attention to certain questions asked today in relation to medical care at the final stages of life. These questions have been elucidated by analysing the situation today with the help of the testimony of revelation and the teaching of the Church, by explaining the principles which are the foundation of Catholic philosophy regarding medical care and finally to apply these principles to concrete questions. These principles have their starting point in the experience of our relationship with God throughout history and the knowledge of the Gospel of the salvation of man in Christ Jesus. However, our philosophy regarding medical care has also its starting point in the convictions we share with many other people of good will. Among these common convictions, we can mention respect for the inviolability of human life and the equality of all human beings, our special responsibility for the weakest members of society and respect for the integrity of the medical profession.

Many of these values today are being questioned by short sighted scientific and political interests and also current ideas that isolate the human person from community. As we called attention to earlier, the danger with this type of individualistic mentality, which among other things asserts the right to euthanasia, is that other concerned parties are forgotten. The request for euthanasia must be taken seriously; however not by allowing the patient to be killed but by attending to him in the process of dying until his life comes to an end in a natural way and commending it into the hands of God.

Death is a natural occurrence, which in its own time, must be accepted by all and which ultimately is the doorway into a new life with God. But as long as we live it is life itself, a wonderful gift from God, that we are called to serve, especially among our seriously ill brothers and sisters. Together with Pope John Paul II, we reject a "culture of death". We respond to his call for a "general mobilisation of consciences and a united ethical effort to activate a great campaign in support of life." We hope that this letter will help to contribute in promoting a "culture of life" in the Nordic Countries. But above all we hope that it will promote respect for the human person, created in the image and likeness of God, redeemed in Christ and called to eternal life.




Exhortations and suggestions

1. We urgently request the elected members of our parliaments and our governments to further develop palliative care in our Nordic Countries. The terminally ill and the dying need more help and support at the final stages of life. According to our position, euthanasia is an unacceptable alternative which undermines the importance of palliative care and jeopardises human dignity. No person should ever be given the possibility of taking the life of an innocent fellow human being. Therefore euthanasia should continue to be forbidden.

2. We request all the Catholic Christians in the Nordic Countries to be especially attentive to the situation of the sick in our churches. Therefore we suggest that in every parish, according to their needs and their possibilities, draw up a pastoral plan so that the elderly and the sick receive regular visits and the possibility of receiving communion if they cannot come to church. This Apostolate of Visitation can if needed be exercised by trained ministers of the Eucharist who have been appointed thereto by the bishop.

3. We exhort all parish priests to regularly provide the sacrament of the sick in their respective parishes. We suggest that the sacrament be celebrated communally, appropriately within the celebration of the Eucharist in order to emphasise the communal bond among and with the sick.

4. We encourage Catholic teachers, nurses and pastors of souls to receive further education in palliative care and to be aware of the special medical and spiritual needs of the dying. We welcome also private initiatives to found houses for hospice care under Christian management.

5. We exhort all our fellow Christian brothers and sisters and all people of good will to actively promote respect for life and actively partake in the general debate and in democratic processes so that the inviolability of human life will increasingly become more respected in our society.


World Day of Prayer for the Sick,
11 February 2002


+ Gerhard Schwenzer, Bishop of Oslo, Chairman of the Nordic Bishops' Conference

+ Anders Arborelius, Bishop of Stockholm, Deputy chairman of the Nordic Bishop's Conference

+ Czeslaw Kozon, Bishop of Copenhagen

+ Johannes B. M. Gijsen, Bishop of Reykjavík

+ Józef Wróbel, Bishop of Helsinki

+ Gerhard Goebel, Bishop-Prelate of Tromsö

+ Georg Muller, Bishop-Prelate of Trondheim

+ William Kenney, Auxiliary bishop of Stockholm

+ Hans Martensen, Bishop emeritus of Copenhagen

+ Hubertus Brandenburg, Bishop emeritus of Stockholm



 
 



Aðalsíðan
English Page



Visits since 30.5.2005